QUOTE(IDOMUCIA @ 2020 01 15, 13:31)
Problema, kad UK mokyklos daugiau neturi teises diskriminuoti pagal lyti. Jei mergaitem leidzia su sijonais - tai ir berniukams neturi teises drausti sijonus.
Jei neleidzia ilgu plauku, tai turi neleisti visiems. Tokie yra UK istatymai dabar. Kazkokios mokyklos proncijoje dar kartais nesuvokia, bet jas greitai pastato i vieta.
Siaip UK mokyklose yra griezta tvarka, bett pagal lyti dabar diskriminuot tikrai negali. Va yra kazkokia mokykla kur liepia visiem ateiti tik su kelnemis. bet tai liecia ir mergaites todel viskas pagal istatymus lieka tik kritikuot.
Tuos dalykus zinau, nes patys suprantat kokiose grupese bendrauju
Nieko panašaus nėra ir net įstatymo tokio nėra.
Jeigu kokioje mokykloje kas nors sudurniavo, tai nereiškia, kad tokia bendra tvarka. Įstatymai prieinami visiems, visi gali su jais susipažinti.
Prašau ištrauka iš įstatymo, kuriuo privalo vadovautis visos mokyklos ir pagal jį turi nustatyti savo taisykles:
Uniforms
2.15 The Equality Act does not deal specifically with school uniform or other aspects of
appearance such as hair colour and style, and the wearing of jewellery and make-up, but
the general requirement not to discriminate in the treatment of pupils applies here as in
relation to other aspects of school policy. It is for the governing body of a school to
decide whether there should be a school uniform and other rules relating to appearance,
and if so what they should be. This flows from the duties placed upon the governing body
by statute to manage the school.
2.16 Long-standing guidance makes it clear that schools must have regard to their
obligations under the Human Rights Act 1998 (it is here rather than in relation to equality
law that most case law has been determined to date) as well as under equality law, and
that they need to be careful that blanket uniform policies do not discriminate because of
race, religion or belief, gender, disability, gender reassignment or sexual orientation.
Consequently it will be up to the individual school to consider the implications their
uniform requirements have on their pupils.
2.17 For example, differences in dress requirements for girls and boys are standard,
and where they dont have significantly more detrimental effects on one sex or the other
they are unlikely to be regarded as discriminatory. But it might be unlawful if, for example,
the uniform was considerably more expensive for girls than for boys. Schools need also
to consider whether flexibility is needed in relation to uniform to meet the needs of a pupil
who is undergoing gender reassignment. It may also be discrimination because of
disability if, for example, a child who has a skin condition which means they cannot wear
nylon is not allowed to wear cotton trousers as part of the uniform.
2.18 There are potential issues around school uniform policies and religion and belief.
Schools should be sensitive to the needs of different cultures, races and religions and act
reasonably in accommodating these needs, without compromising important school
policies, such as school safety or discipline. It is well established that it would be race
discrimination to refuse to let a Sikh child wear a turban because of a school policy
requiring that caps be worn, but legal judgments have not supported the absolute right of
people of faith to wear garments or jewellery to indicate that faith.
čiut čiut stabilizavosi tikėjimas kad ta durnių kadencija kažkada pasibaigs
